JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 18, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Raul Castilla Castilla

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Nulidad Y Aclaracion.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia de aclaración
Nulidad Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Carácter excepcional
  • No constituye instrumento para revivir asunto resuelto ni como recurso
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazaron por improcedentes las solicitudes de aclaración y nulidad de la Sentencia T-629/99, formuladas por el accionante, toda vez que no son válidos entonces los argumentos que pueda exponer la parte no favorecida por una sentencia, aduciendo falta de claridad o contradicción en el texto de la misma, pretendiendo dar un alcance distinto a lo fallado, como pretexto para fundamentar una solicitud de nulidad, cuando en realidad busca nueva deliberación en torno a los puntos objeto de controversia.

Es decir, no es aceptable que la nulidad se use como instrumento para revivir el caso ya resuelto, ni como recurso.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. RECHAZANSE por improcedentes las solicitudes de aclaracion y nulidad de la Sentencia T-629 de 1999, formuladas por el senor Raul Castilla Castilla.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.